The jury was given an hour for lunch. I spent my lunch hour walking around Fort Wayne and enjoyed the atmosphere. I also took that time to call my fiancee and family to let them know that I was selected to be on the jury, so I wasn't sure when I would be done. After my walk and my phone calls, I returned to the room that was reserved for the jury. After waiting there for five or ten minutes, the rest of the jury arrived and shortly after that, the bailiff walked in and told us there was a delay and that we were free to leave and do whatever we wanted for another fifteen minutes. I, as well as most of the other jurors, chose to stay in the room and just talk or listen to the others talking. There were about nine of us in the room, but four people did all the talking, mostly about the weather in Florida. The rest of us just listened to them talk or read books. After twenty minutes, all the jury was once again in the room and the bailiff then took us into the courtroom. As the first juror entered the courtroom, the bailiff told everyone to rise; once I reached my seat, because I was the last juror, the bailiff told everyone they could again sit down. Once we were all seated, it was time to continue with the trial.
The next witness the Plaintiff presented was the victim, the person who wrote the check that was later stolen and forged. The victim testified that she had placed the check in the mailbox and noticed, on an on-line statement, that the check had been cashed a lot sooner than she expected it to be cashed. She then testified that she had a stop-payment on the check and talked to the bank and asked for a copy of the check. It was then that she realized that her check had been stolen and forged. The Prosecutor then presented her with a copy of the check and asked if it was her signature on the check, to which she said 'yes'. He then asked if the check was different in any way from the way she had written the check, to which she mentioned that the amount the check was made out to and the person it was payable to were changed. The Prosecutor then asked if she knew the defendant at the time she wrote the check, to which she said 'no'. The witness was then excused. The final witness was a police detective investigating the case. He testified that the defendant was involved with the case he was working on. He also testified that the defendant was arrested and charged. The witness was then dismissed.
After the last witness was dismissed, the Prosecutor announced that the Prosecution Rests. After that, the Defense Attorney spoke up and said something that I wasn't able to make out. However, the judge heard him and after a few seconds of thinking, the judged asked that the courtroom be cleared. When this happened, the bailiff quickly stood, asked everyone to rise, and told us, the jury, that we had to go back to our room. While in the room, everyone was confused abut the urgent dismissal and wondered what was going on. After about ten minutes, the judge walked into the room, with his robe in his arms. The judge thanked us for showing up and told us that we were no longer needed and free to leave. He told us that the Prosecutor did not show, beyond reasonable doubt, that the defendant was guilty. Normally, it is the jury who decides this, but in this case, there was absolutely no doubt that the Prosecutor failed to show the defendant was guilty. Specifically, the Prosecutor did not show that the defendant cashed the check. In opening statements, the Defense admitted that the Defendant cashed the check; however, opening statements are not considered evidence. Secondly, the Prosecutor did not show that the defendant had the intent to commit fraud. The only thing that the Prosecutor presented was evidence that showed that a check had been stolen, altered and cashed; he did not present any evidence that the defendant cashed the check or that the defendant had the intent to commit fraud; therefore, the Judge declared that the Prosecutor did not show the defendant was guilty and the Judge declared that the defendant was found to be not guilty of fraud in this case. I'm not sure if the defendant had been charged for other crimes, but in our case, the defendant was found to be not guilty.
8 hours ago
